South Carolina has decided it is reasonable and non restrictive for their voters to show picture I.D. cards when they come to the polls to exercise their LEGAL right to vote. The argument that many people considered minorities, might not be able to afford or obtain I.D’s is idiotic. The states provide for people who have not the means to pay the $15 for the card. They seem to have no difficulty producing similar identification for the purchase of cigarettes or alcohol. What might they produce when an officer of the law pulls their car over for an infraction? Having no I.D. will make it easier for hospitals to provide free care at considerable cost. Is there just nothing that certain people are not entitled to? Could this be just another obama/democratic ploy that holder supports, for the purpose of being able to look the other way when dead people, prisoners and illegal aliens show up to vote for the candidate chosen for them? Look at what happened in Philadelphia in 2008 when holder et al stonewalled New Black Panther voter intimidation case. South Carolina should reject any voter who cannot produce proper identification, as should the other 49 (not 56, mr. obama) STATES OF THE UNION.
eric holder’s POSITION ON SOUTH CAROLINA REQUIREMENT FOR VOTER I.D CARDS: HOW PURE AND NON-POLITICAL ARE HIS MOTIVES?